
Originally Posted by
Gohron
I was simply saying that smoking was less contributing to lung cancer then anti-smoking groups make people believe.
Anecdotal Evidence: In the 4 years doing my job I have treated like one person with lung cancer that a)was not once a heavy smoker, or b)was in a profession in which they were exposed to smoke.
You're a fucking moron if you don't think almost all lung cancers are caused by smoking.
And Andrew, when I did oncology in University (and I'm sure it's the same) prostate cancer and breast cancer kill more people (atleast in Australia) than lung cancer. The survival rates in prostate cancer and breast cancer are MUCH higher than lung cancer, but so many more people get breast and prostate cancers than lung cancer (cause only some people are stupid enough to smoke).
Quick zephyrs blow, vexing daft Jim.
Bookmarks