2012

[Advocate]

ok new round.

[Frogacuda]

is that civilization still around?

Sort of. It wasn't wiped out and didn't collapse, anyway. Take that, Mayans.

Anyway, the 2012 apocalypse thing is a fabrication anyway, so I guess splitting hairs on historic timelines is the tip of the iceberg.

[Advocate]

But the Mayans still have remnants of a civilization.

kinda.

Aztecs were wiped out.

[Mr-K]

Advocate just wants us to respect the movie where everything collapses.

Update: EVERYTHING

[Rumpy]

I'm always surprised when Emmerich has a new movie, hasn't his last couple of movies completely tanked? This dude is obsessed with the end of the world, he really needs to try something new.

[Dyne]

and theres 4 more 2012's coming out next year all doing the same thing.

Is this movie the one that had the original trailer where the Buddhist temple got destroyed?

[Mr-K]

Is this movie the one that had the original trailer where the Buddhist temple got destroyed?

Yeah, there's a brief clip of it in the new trailer.

I'm always surprised when Emmerich has a new movie, hasn't his last couple of movies completely tanked? This dude is obsessed with the end of the world, he really needs to try something new.

Day After TOmorrow did well despite it being what it was (stupid), but yeah, 10,000 BC tanked pretty hard.

*checks*

Nevermind, it made 300 million worldwide.

[Advocate]

Advocate just wants us to respect the movie where all of humanity dies.

Update: EVERYONE DIES, INCLUDING BLACKS.

[arjue]

I have a feeling I just saw all of the cg set pieces, but if the entire movie was just amazing cg destruction shot after amazing cg destruction shot it would be rad. I don't know why they even bother with a story.

[Mman]

Indeed, it is what people go to these movies for anyway.