Reply With QuoteIt looks good but what makes it different from MW 1 or 2 besides the setting?
Thank you, Satoru Iwata
So much ****ing semen.
It looks good but what makes it different from MW 1 or 2 besides the setting?
metal face
Looks like dogshit in every way imaginable. "Lookit me. Im gunna drive a RC car around with a bomb on it." I thought they were getting rid of killstreaks. Also, nice recoil on the automatic guns.
NowPlaying: Battlefield series . DarkSouls . MGS collection . Cap+SNK fighters . AceCombat series . ArmoredCore series
can't wake up
This question is being asked on the assumption that it was supposed to be different from MW. This assumption is incorrect.Originally Posted by Dyne
Black Cocks imo.
can't wake up
That's why it's on the top of your wish list?
So much ****ing semen.
It amazes me how long they're going to ride this into the ground.
It's the same publisher that's done 16 Tony Hawk games.
This is what they do.
Well, thats a nice welcome edition. Saving replays. Can't wait to play it.
I can do all things through Christ, who strengthens me.
Cuckoo Daddy Long-legs
Looks even more gimmicky than MW2, and I thought that was impossible. I'm still interested due to Treyarch and to answer Diff from earlier, I like Treyarch more than IW due to their map designs, their extra modes and superior map packs and most importantly, their balancing and post game support squashing out glitches quickly.
Cars and cameras look lame though. Frontlines 2.0 bullshit IMO. Also, I wonder what extras they're gonna try to make us pay for. Replays? I bet...
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks