I might have to actually play this twice. I missed a chest right in the beginning and I'm still mad about it.
I might have to actually play this twice. I missed a chest right in the beginning and I'm still mad about it.
Wait a second, if Comstock isn't older/from the future then why does the drowning make the Elizabeths disappear?
EDIT:Yeah, I went back and listened to that Voxophone and I don't think it implies that that's responsible for his aging, although it might be responsible for his cancer. I think there's a definite implication that Comstock is an older version of DeWitt somehow, it's the only way for his death undoing Comstock to make sense, but I can't quite figure it out.
Last edited by Frogacuda; 29 Mar 2013 at 09:11 PM.
Sorry it's a different vox but there is one where lucette specifically says The metastasis has aged him quickly and maybe it's because of the device So yeah it was specifically noted the difference.
As for your first thing He's not booker from the future, he's booker from an alternate universe, one where he accepted the baptism. Two sides of the same coin, going with the idea that each choice made in life creates another universe. So drowning the booker that made that choice makes elizabeth vanish because now anna isn't taking into the alternate universe by comstock
You sir, are a hideous hermaphroditical character which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.
But they didn't drown the Booker that made that choice, they downed Booker 20 years later. How would that affect Comstock's timeline? If you drowned 1890 Booker at his Baptism, that would make sense, but that's not what happens.
I think that's what happens though, remember All of the Elizabeths show up as he talks about his baptism, then the screen goes black.
I don't get it.
She killed a Booker that had not become Comstock yet. I assume she means to kill all instances of Booker.
SPOILERS
SPOILERS
SPOILERS
SPOILERS
SPOILERS
SPOILERS
But the game is being told in first-person. There's no way that could have been another Booker, it's the Booker you've been for the whole game. Plus, he clearly has knowledge of the game's events, which is why he allows himself to be drowned. 1890 Booker wouldn't.
Last edited by Frogacuda; 30 Mar 2013 at 10:51 AM.
Oh Tapatalk, you're so terrible. Guess I'll switch back to Safari.
Bookmarks