Kotaku had a fluff piece (lol they're all fluff pieces that's the joke) about how FFXV will be amazing. Because Ito has been the director of all the last Final Fantasy on consoles, and those are excluding the original Famicon, VI, IX, and XII.
Borrowed this from a friend today, because he had the collectors edition and has NEVER TOUCHED IT.
I'm about three hours in and I'm really happy with this game so far. It's no FFXII, but it takes the great battle system from XIII and puts it in a world that is explorable, ridiculously open and gives you some neat little features like "previously on FFXIII" when you start up again and the whole quite time type things.
Great improvement, hopefully the next FF on PS4 takes all of this and puts it into a FFXII frame. There really won't be an excuse for no towns and linear paths next time, just use the same resources as this game at higher res and AA and you have next gen.
Last edited by Opaque; 02 Jun 2012 at 01:56 AM.
Kotaku had a fluff piece (lol they're all fluff pieces that's the joke) about how FFXV will be amazing. Because Ito has been the director of all the last Final Fantasy on consoles, and those are excluding the original Famicon, VI, IX, and XII.
I literally don't know what you're trying to say here.
EDIT: I read the article and I get it now. What you wrote sounded like a stroke victim trying to get that point across. Here's how an English speaking adult should have written thet:
Yeah, if he takes the resources they've built for XIII 2, some of the better ideas they've added into the series and then puts it in a world and combat system like XII it really could be the best Final Fantasy. We'll see.Originally Posted by Thief Silver in a perfect world
Last edited by Opaque; 02 Jun 2012 at 02:25 AM.
I'm not surprised.
The guy who directed VI, IX, and XII would direct FFXV.
VI, IX, and XII are by FAR the best FF games. So, awesome.
HA! HA! I AM USING THE INTERNET!!1
My Backloggery
WRONG.
VI is worse than most of them, ESPECIALLY IV. It's half a good game. It's like XIII, except with VI, the shit part is the 2nd half where you get to go around and do stuff.
Donk
Finch, I think you've been out in the sun too long.
No, he's right about that. Opera House was the only really great thing about VI.
The opera house was whatever, more that I really liked how they destroyed the world and then left a huge amount up to the player to proceed. The dying guy on the beach could be saved but was very difficult, you didn't have to collect everyone to proceed, etc. They also had really nice touches throughout like putting the player in the shoes of characters outside the party just to provide additional viewpoints and the art design was the best in JRPGs up to that point.
It's overrated and the translation is kinda shitty compared to modern games, sure, but next to IV? C'mon, get serious.
IV is timeless, best game in the series after XII and IX.
Donk
Bookmarks