Page 6 of 20 FirstFirst ... 24567810 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 198

Thread: Django Unchained

  1. Awesome movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by Razor Ramon View Post
    I don't even the rage I mean )#@($@IU_+FJ$(U#()IRFK)_#
    Quote Originally Posted by Some Stupid Japanese Name View Post
    I'm sure whatever Yeller wrote is fascinating!

  2. So, remember that theory of Tarantino's movies are interconnected somehow?

    Well, Django and Basterds are in the same universe, in fact Django is the second in the trilogy. Killer Crow is the third film and that Django and the Basterds may all appear in some way in the next film.

    PLUS! Django and his wife are related to John Shaft (apparently).

    link:
    http://screenrant.com/quentin-tarant...jango-trilogy/

    Iconic post-modern filmmaker Quentin Tarantino incorporated spaghetti western elements throughout his throwback Kung Fu revenge tale Kill Bill, followed by the Nazi-killing adventure Inglourious Basterds. How appropriate, then, that he should go on to create a proper homage to the genre with Django Unchained (read ourreview), which is currently stirring up the pot of controversy over its depiction of slavery and African-American history.

    Now, the auteur is planning to round out his historical revenge fantasy trilogy with a final installment that likewise builds on Django by fully saluting the Blaxploitation genre – and incorporates Basterds‘ men-on-a-mission sub-genre inspiration – that could go under the title Killer Crow.

    Earlier this month, Tarantino sat down for an interview with The Root‘s editor-in-chief and professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. Their discussion was focused on Django – including, cinematic traditions it draws from and the film’s depiction of slavery – but it began with the writer-director (and occasional actor) being asked “What’s next on the list of oppressors to off?”

    Tarantino offered the following:
    I don’t know exactly when I’m going to do it, but there’s something about this that would suggest a trilogy. My original idea for Inglourious Basterds way back when was that this [would be] a huge story that included the [smaller] story that you saw in the film, but also followed a bunch of black troops, and they had been f–ked over by the American military and kind of go apes–t. They basically — the way Lt. Aldo Raines (Brad Pitt) and the Basterds are having an “Apache resistance” — [the] black troops go on an Apache warpath and kill a bunch of white soldiers and white officers on a military base and are just making a warpath to Switzerland.
    What’s interesting about this proposition is that such a film would indeed build on the themes of Django, which (in its own Tarantino-esque way) is about the birth of the archetypal Blaxploitation protagonist. Quite literally, as Tarantino revealed at Comic-Con that he imagined the eponymous character (Jamie Foxx) and his wife Broomhilda von Shaft (Kerry Washington) to be John Shaft’s ancestors. Therefore,Killer Crow would explore the next stage in the (pseudo-)history of Blaxploitation cinema, while also bringing things full circle to the WW II setting of Basterds:
    So that was always going to be part of it. And I was going to do it as a miniseries, and that was going to be one of the big storylines. When I decided to try to turn it into a movie, that was a section I had to take out to help tame my material. I have most of that written. It’s ready to go; I just have to write the second half of it.
    Tarantino added that such a project would be called Killer Crow (“or something like that”) and unfold after the Normandy invasion in 1944, concurrent with Basterds. Moreover, he indicated some of the Basterds could make an appearance since the two stories immediately overlap. Who knows, maybe one of Django’s descendants will be among the character ranks, lending further credence to the popular unified QT universe theory.

    Django has incited outrage for reasons ranging from the savage nature of its world to its anachronistic mix of elements, be it the soundtrack or visual shout-outs to other films. Of course, the heavy use of racial epithets continues to prompt anger from prominent black artists like Spike Lee (who’s bound to have something to say about QT planning a film about black soldiers in WW II, following his own projectMiracle at St. Anna).

    Here’s what Tarantino said, with regard to Django‘s portrayal of history:
    Well, you know if you’re going to make a movie about slavery and are taking a 21st-century viewer and putting them in that time period, you’re going to hear some things that are going to be ugly, and you’re going see some things that are going be ugly. That’s just part and parcel of dealing truthfully with this story, with this environment, with this land. Personally, I find [the criticism] ridiculous. Because it would be one thing if people are out there saying, “You use [the n-word] much more excessively in this movie than it was used in 1858 in Mississippi.” Well, nobody’s saying that. And if you’re not saying that, you’re simply saying I should be lying. I should be watering it down. I should be making it more easy to digest.
    No, I don’t want it to be easy to digest. I want it to be a big, gigantic boulder, a jagged pill and you have no water.
    Indeed, the evolution of that derogatory term (and the culture of discrimination it symbolizes) has been quietly touched upon previously in Tarantino’s Pulp Fictionand Jackie Brown; Django shines an uncomfortable spotlight on the issue that makes it impossible to ignore. Expect Killer Crow to follow that trend – and keep the buzz (good and bad) circling Tarantino’s name once it finally sees the light of day.

    For more insight about the research and thought process behind Django Unchained(which is now in theaters), check out The Root‘s full Tarantino interview.
    Meanwhile, we’ll keep you posted on Killer Crow as the story develops.
    I can do all things through Christ, who strengthens me.

  3. Fuckin' loved it. The one expectation I have of Tarantino movies is that he gets to make a movie exactly how he wants it to be, and I certainly felt like that was the case here. Was it ridiculous? Of course. Most of his movies are. But they have awesome characters played by amazing actors delivering stellar written lines. And usually, his movies are so out-of-order that it was actually refreshing to see one played straight through chronologically.

    Christoph Waltz and Jamie Foxx were amazing. I had heard Leo DiCaprio was a seriously scary villain (and I did get a taste of that), but Sam Jackson stole the villainy here. Nice.

    The action didn't bother me. Quite the opposite, I had a cheesey-ass grin on my face for the entire duration. Was it integral to the plot? I'd say yes. Remember the conversation Dr. Schulz and Django have about walking up to a farmer and asking to buy his best horse? No, you have to buy the whole farm. That movie couldn't have ended the right way if only a sixth of the plantation's white folk were killed and their covert operation was a success. They had to take the whole farm.

    Plus, Django has a flair for drama. But really: it's not just Tarantino adding excessive violence for the sake of it. There's symbolism here.

    Also, even if these films aren't chronologically connected in a universe, they certainly are companions thematically.
    Last edited by Toupee; 30 Dec 2012 at 02:17 PM.

  4. There are characters within the universe that have the same last names, as well. The Bear Jew I believe has the same last name of someone in his 90's movies (can't remember which one).
    Quote Originally Posted by rezo
    Once, a gang of fat girls threatened to beat me up for not cottoning to their advances. As they explained it to me: "guys can usually beat up girls, but we are all fat, and there are a lot of us."

  5. Quote Originally Posted by Advocate View Post
    Killer Crow is the third film and that Django and the Basterds may all appear in some way in the next film.
    This is not what it says at all.

  6. Quote Originally Posted by Frogacuda View Post
    This is not what it says at all.
    If you bothered to click the link within the article. It said this.

    HLG: That might very well be the third of the trilogy.
    QT: That would be the third of the trilogy. It would be [connected to] Inglourious Basterds, too, because Inglourious Basterds are in it, but it is about the soldiers. It would be called Killer Crow or something like that.
    I can do all things through Christ, who strengthens me.

  7. I don't care about any of that stuff.

  8. Never anything believe QT says about his plans for future projects until cameras are rolling.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gohron View Post
    I like doing stuff with animals and kids

  9. #59
    watched it, thought it was good, didn't really have a problem with anything. The premise was probably the craziest he's done in a while and I was waiting for it to fall it appart in his hands, but he connected all the dots despite everything and it made for a good movie.

    I didn't personally like the rap songs being in the movie. Many of the vintage songs he used added to feel of the movie, while the rap songs seemed very modern by comparison and kind of pulled me away. They were used only sparingly, so its not really that big of a deal.

    I didn't have a problem with the action. Some people might think it was way too much, and those people would be stupid. This movie is suppose to take place during one of the bloodiest parts of US history. It wasn't excessive, it was honest.

  10. I'm glad that Mississippi was accurately depicted as hell on earth.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo