Reply With Quote
I think he's been a replicant since "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?"
just sayin.
lone standing tuft
What I've seen from Ridley Scott has been mostly shit since he's had access to CG. However I'ma still hold out for hope that a Blade Runner prequel/sequel will be good. Despite all evidence to the contrary I want to believe that the old man has some magic left in him.
Also, why is it a problem if Deckard is a replicant?
...because without the bitter, baby, the sweet ain't as sweet.
I think he's been a replicant since "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?"
just sayin.
Originally Posted by dechecho
lone standing tuft
I just reread Do Androids not that long ago... does the book verify that Deckard's a replicant? Sadly I don't remember.
...because without the bitter, baby, the sweet ain't as sweet.
He isn't a replicant in the book. It's very clear about that
You sir, are a hideous hermaphroditical character which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.
I really liked how the BR game took a lot of material from the book...
Magatsu
I have a problem with Ridley going so far to make a confirmation either way. In Prometheus, there weren't any obvious clues to confirm that Charlize Theron's character was an android. I just dislike any version of the movie with the damned unicorn dream, even though the earlier cuts offer enough clues of Deckard's identity.
This Mishima kills fascists
The unicorn dream is great. You're high.
Get the fuck out of here with that Prometheus shit.
I just saw Prometheus and I didn't even THINK of that.
Maybe in the directors cut, the captain goes to her and says, "What are you some kind of fucking robot?' to which she replies "Yes, I'm a fucking robot, now lets get fucking!". They never find the engineers and wait maybe I just watched a porno...
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks