I honestly don't see what's so offensively hideous about it. I thought it looked kinda bad in screenshots, but in motion it's fine.
I honestly don't see what's so offensively hideous about it. I thought it looked kinda bad in screenshots, but in motion it's fine.
He doesn't have pink hair. This is hardly a sequel to LttP.
HA! HA! I AM USING THE INTERNET!!1
My Backloggery
Maybe "ugly" isn't the word. Maybe it's more "unremarkable." The biggest problem I have is that the actual promo art is GREAT and all of the preceding games look GREAT (except the BROWN in half of Twilight Princess) and this game looks OKAY I GUESS.
It's the best Zelda bar none in all other regards. I guess maybe I'm just sad because it deserved better.
I'm with Compass. There is zero about this game that is ugly. I don't think a top down Zelda game could look any better without being actual 2D. You mother fuckers will cry about anything.
I don't see how saying an ugly thing is ugly counts as crying, but ok.
I've already admitted it sounds like a great game and that I'm going to buy it. I've liked ugly games before, but ugly is ugly.
Sorry, I guess.
Zero? The Link model is terrible for one. There's plenty about it that is ugly.
Read many reviews not written by fanboys, it's not some out-of-left-field opinion.
As for what can be better, the Phantom Hourglass style but with the 3DS hardware would be far preferable.
I don't see why critiquing a game is "crying."
Bookmarks