Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 68910111214 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 217

Thread: The Order: 1886 (PS4)

  1. #91

  2. #92
    The CE is available for preorder at Best Buy for $60. I'm tempted to burn all three of my GCU copies for $48. My copy would probably wind up being free or close to it.

  3. #93

  4. A youtuber did a playthrough that clocked in at around 5 Hours, including deaths. Ready at Dawn was SO NOT FAZED by it that they issued a statement.

    "I know there are numbers out there," he said. "I know why the question comes up. I know numbers have been put out there that are actually not right. It's impossible to finish the game in that time, so we know the numbers are wrong.

    "At the end of the day, we're not going to comment on it. We can't stop people from writing the things they do. And we're not going to jump at every single mistake that is made out there. Every time somebody has the wrong impression of something we made, or somebody writes the wrong thing about what we did, it would be a full-time job to be like, oh no, that's not right. We make games. We do what we do for the players. And, ultimately, that's where I want to leave it."
    I agree that a 1.5 hour long movie isn't going to magically be better if it were cut to a 9 Hour edit. He then goes on to this.

    "Game length is important," he said. "Every game has to take its own time to tell its story. Some games can be short. Some games can be long. I still remember the first time I picked up Modern Warfare, I finished the campaign in about three-and-a-half or four hours. And it was fun because they made that campaign work for that because they had something else."
    Which makes no sense, because I think Korly is the only person I know who plays the campaign on CoD and just drops it. The Order has no multiplayer. Seems like a lot of damage control for something they're not going to comment on.

  5. #95
    There shouldn't be anything to comment on. There is absolutely nothing inherently wrong with a less-than-ten-hour single player game, and multiplayer does not inherently add value.

  6. So then don't address it. He addressed and rationalized it. If he believed nothing was wrong he wouldn't have gone that far.

    I agree the story will probably be great, the game short and lackluster but I've played plenty of those games as well.

  7. #97
    I'll let you know Friday, barring some catastrophic advance reviews citing actual gameplay issues.

  8. Well someone check the temperature in hell cause I actually agree with Yoshi here. Everything doesn't need to be minimum x-number of hours to be good. As long as its enjoyable I'm ok with a less than 10 hour single player game. I get so little gaming time any more I'm excited by the prospect that I'll probably finish this game in a week or two instead of taking months(for me).
    Where I play
    Quote Originally Posted by Dolemite
    I've changed my mind about Korian. Anyone that can piss off so many people so easily is awesome. You people are suckers, playing right into his evil yellow hands.

  9. I have no problem whatsoever with a short full priced game.

    That said, this game doesn't look good.

  10. This is out this week, right?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo