Page 22 of 26 FirstFirst ... 8182021222324 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 260

Thread: Godzilla (2014)

  1. Quote Originally Posted by kingoffighters View Post
    Maybe the first two, but the third TF is better than PR.
    It's ordeal, the trial to survive
    Check out Mr. Businessman
    He bought some wild, wild life
    On the way to the stock exchange
    He got some wild, wild life

  2. #212
    The was still a little bad. Just not mind blowingly bad.

  3. Godzilla didn't get busy.

  4. I thought this movie was boring, and the plot was full of holes. The danger felt too distant to have an impact, outside of Cranston the character were flat stereotypes, and the action was dark and poorly shot. Pacific Rim has a lot of flaws, but it was better than this. The main character happened to be a bomb disposal expert, knowing analogue timers that haven't been used way before he was born? He happens to be everywhere the movie needs him to be, and survives what kills the people around him multiple times over? Ugh. The 1998 Godzilla had a better plot than this one, even if their Godzilla was awful.
    "I've watched while the maggots have defiled the earth. They have
    built their castles and had their wars. I cannot stand by idly any longer." - Otogi 2

  5. Movie about giant fighting monsters has weird plot holes? NO WAY!!!!
    Xbox Live- SamuraiMoogle

  6. Why does one give free reign for the other?

  7. You can waste your life deciphering why minute unrealistic details in a movie about a giant lizard battling a giant bat in San Francisco matter so much. I don't care.
    Quote Originally Posted by rezo
    Once, a gang of fat girls threatened to beat me up for not cottoning to their advances. As they explained it to me: "guys can usually beat up girls, but we are all fat, and there are a lot of us."

  8. #218
    It's possible to make a monster movie that doesn't have a stupid plot. Same for a summer blockbuster or whatever other genre people like to defend with that weak shit. No.
    HA! HA! I AM USING THE INTERNET!!1
    My Backloggery

  9. that was supposed to be a "YOU."

  10. Quote Originally Posted by AaronChance View Post
    I thought this movie was boring, and the plot was full of holes. The danger felt too distant to have an impact, outside of Cranston the character were flat stereotypes, and the action was dark and poorly shot. Pacific Rim has a lot of flaws, but it was better than this. The main character happened to be a bomb disposal expert, knowing analogue timers that haven't been used way before he was born? He happens to be everywhere the movie needs him to be, and survives what kills the people around him multiple times over? Ugh. The 1998 Godzilla had a better plot than this one, even if their Godzilla was awful.
    Your "plot holes" aren't that. It might be implausible for all of that to go the right way but not impossible.

    The biggest gaffe, IMHO, is the 20 mile radius for the nuclear blast (though, I don't recall the actual size of the bomb and even this might still be plausible depending on wind conditions and size of the weapon) which would've been solved more easily if the weapon was defused instead of exploded. That and the whole radiation = food source for the beasts. Sometimes you have to overlook the science a bit in films like this.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo