But you haven't explained once exactly how or why you think anyone is connecting Russiagate to election integrity. Can you actually try writing your whole thought out instead of these impenetrably broad generalizations?
I can have the opinion that Laffy Taffy causes racial animus, but if I say that, you'd probably expect that I could elaborate on why, right? The connection between those things isn't intuitive. For some reason you seem offended at someone asking you why. It isn't about being asked to "prove" it, it's just about being able to explain what your thinking is...
Not quite., My argument is that these voters don't trust elections because the one person they trust more than anyone else spent an entire year telling them not to.The entire genesis of this was your statement that almost half of voters don't trust elections anymore because of the insurrection and the events leading up to it.
Look, if you want to talk about the root of something, that is assigning a causal relationship, i.e. blame, but please stop telling me all the things you don't mean and just say what you do, clearly and completely, instead of making me play 20 questions and getting pissy about it.YOUR conversation is about "blame".
So you're saying that conservative voters specifically believe that Russian interference is responsible for 2016 election? That doesn't really track...My argument, or opinion, is that it really began well before that with Trump/Russia and the effects of that on voters of both parties but more specifically conservatives/right.
You keep phrasing things really broadly like this and when I ask you to state your argument in a clearer or more specific way, you just act indignant and refuse.
Bookmarks