No, I am asking you to explain your thought process by connecting those dots.
We might still disagree in the end, but it would go a long way to show that you're at least arguing in good faith instead of doubling down on obvious bullshit that you're incapable of defending.
When people have doubts based on untruths, wouldn't the people spreading those untruths get the blame?Again, you're litigating facts about things that I haven't taken a position on. I'm saying that those things, whether true or not, have cast doubts in the minds of certain voters despite not necessarily being true.
We're not talking past each other, you straight up refuse to elaborate on anything you're saying even when pressed.I don't care to discuss this further. We're talking past each other and it's getting tiresome so I'm out of this conversation.
Sent from my LE2127 using Tapatalk
Bookmarks