And once again you turn a general discussion into micromanaging facts and arguing against a case that I have not made. This is why I should really choose not to even have these discussions with you at all. I am NOT being specific, I am merely saying that one side or the other has presented legal challenges after an election without getting into specifics but merely providing examples of those cases. Al Gore wanted recounts in only four counties in Florida, all of which were very blue and it was determined unconstitutional for a variety of reasons by the Supreme Court. I AM NOT ARGUING FOR OR AGAINST THE MERITS OF ANY OF THESE CASES MERELY THAT EACH PARTY HAS BROUGHT FORTH LEGAL CHALLENGES TO LOST ELECTIONS. Do you understand?
And?
After the fact isn't talking about the election, it's talking about modifying election law(s) that have been set by the legislature. Ie... if the legislature makes elections law(s) and the Supreme Court modifies those laws they are doing so AFTER the fact and the legislature has no say unless re-writing the election law again.
And? I said the Republicans are wasting their money doing this so I think we're on the same page here...
Bookmarks