I'm not sure what the OP point is at all. One, just because dorks that over-indulge their childhood cross over into our spheres of interest doesn't mean they represent some grand cultural change. Even if they did, I doubt anyone would argue that's the new definition of cool. Two, why are celebrities the measure of what's cool? Obviously their public exposure means it's easier to grasp consensus, but I think we all know people personally that we consider "cool" based on a meaningful set of standards, versus those of an arbitrary pop culture.
That said, Timothy Olyphant is pretty damn cool, on screen and in person, in a man-crush way. Neil deGrasse Tyson would probably walk off with most my cool awards though.
Bookmarks